Legal Opinion

People v. McGill

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 25, 1974No. 25668PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kelley

The district attorney prosecutes this interlocutory appeal from a ruling of the Larimer County District Court sustaining defendants’ motion to suppress' certain evidence which was seized pursuant to a search warrant. C.A.R. 4.1(a). The trial court granted the motion as to all evidence which was seized except for one marijuana plant. The district attorney contends that there was probable cause to support the warrant and that the warrant described the place and the items to be seized with the requisite specificity required by the Colorado Constitution and the United States Constitution. Colo.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. HelmkaWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. AndersonHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  4. People v. LindholmSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  5. People v. OynesColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API