Legal Opinion

People v. Oynes

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 8, 1996No. 94CA0676PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge HUME.

Defendant, Robert John Oynes, appeals the judgment of conviction entered following a trial to the court in which he was found guilty of one count of cultivation of marijuana. Defendant’s appeal rests solely upon the trial court’s ruling denying his pre-trial motion to suppress evidence and statements obtained as the result of two allegedly unlawful searches. We affirm.

I

A

Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in ruling that, for constitutional purposes, no “search” occurred when a police officer used binoculars to observe marijuana ■ plants in defendant’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. California v. CiraoloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Miguel Angel TabordaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. People v. CagleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. HernleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. CompanColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Rook v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. and 14CA1436. People v. HarrisColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Rose v. City and County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. People v. ZamoraColorado Court of Appeals · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API