Legal Opinion

In re Barrett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 19, 1994No. D8608-65792; CA A72437PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Wife petitions for review of our decision that held that the trial court erred in holding husband in contempt. 123 Or App 201, 859 P2d 557 (1993). We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15(1), and allow it.

Husband appeals from a judgment of contempt under former ORS 33.0101 and wife cross-appeals. In our original opinion, we set out the following facts:

“In 1986, the parties entered into a stipulated decree of dissolution of marriage. The dissolution judgment incorporated the parties’ marital settlement agreement. The agreement provides that husband pay wife $20,000 for her…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Best v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Carothers v. CarothersOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Davidson v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hogue v. HogueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Hogue v. HogueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Marriage of BarrettOregon Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API