Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Corona v. Coplen

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1919No. Civ. No. 2509PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

On March 22, 1917, plaintiff held two notes made to it by defendant, one for one thousand two hundred dollars, secured by mortgage upon 150 tons of hay, the other, unsecured, for two thousand dollars, and both of which were then due. Defendant was a general depositor in said bank and at the time had on deposit therewith $393.38, which sum the bank, without notice to him, applied upon the unsecured note of two thousand dollars. Upon learning of this fact, defendant telephoned the bank he wanted the deposit applied in liquidation of the secured note, with which request the plaintiff, upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McKean v. German-American Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Gnarini v. Swiss American BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Melander v. Western National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Security Pacific National Bank v. WozabCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Jensen v. State Bank of AllisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  3. Bromberg v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Zion's Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. RouseUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Purdy v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API