Consol. Nat'l Bank v. Pac. Coast S.S. Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
The complaint in this action, showing that plaintiff and defendant are corporations, is in two counts; the first alleging “ that defendant is indebted to the plaintiff for moneys had and received by it from the plaintiff in the sum of $13,574.47, which sum is now due and unpaid.” In the second count it is alleged, substantially, that for many successive years the defendant did business with the plaintiff by depositing in plaintiff’s bank, at the city of San Diego, and drawing therefrom on its checks large sums of money; during which time the defendant frequently overdrew its…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hurley v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Bickford v. . MenierNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
3Cited by16 opinions
- Eatwell v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- San Francisco Breweries v. SchurtzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Chickasha Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- BK. OF AMERICA, NAT. TRUST & SAV. v. HorowytzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Houghton v. LawtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.