Diestelhorst v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Review originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District to annul an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
Petitioner seeks the annulment of an award made by said commission to said applicant for an injury received by the latter while employed by the petitioner to act as a general helper around a gold dredger. It is claimed that the accident was due to the “willful misconduct of said Bert Bollinger, and therefore the commission was without jurisdiction to make the award. ” It is admitted that if no other rational conclusion as to the attributable cause of the accident can be drawn from the evidence, then, in the exercise of its statutory authority, the court should vacate and annul said award. It…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Great Western Power Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Lewis & Clark County v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1916
- Nickerson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Guyer v. Sterling Laundry Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Pacific Coast Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gonier v. Chase Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Frint Motor Car Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Calumet v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1920
- Bay Shore Laundry Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Elk Grove Union High School District v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.