Legal Opinion

Spencer v. City of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1925Published

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Eminent domain is the offspring of necessity. Public necessity, or urgent public policy, is the only justification for seizing the property of a law-abiding citizen against his will. In all cases of this character, the law not only requires a sufficient procedure for condemnation, but likewise demands that such procedure be strictly pursued. Further, the acts conferring the power of eminent domain upon a corporation must be strictly construed in favor of the person whose lands are about to be taken against his will. This is so because the power to condemn is in derogation of common right: 20…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. United States v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Logan v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. United States v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API