Legal Opinion
Harder v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided January 29, 2020No. 8:18-cv-00058Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA THOMAS HARDER, Plaintiff, 8:18CV58 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. Defendant, Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR), moves to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Ernest Chiodo (Dr. Chiodo) and Dr. Hernando Perez (Dr. Perez) at trial. (Filing No. 33; Filing No. 35). Further, UPRR moves for summary judgment claiming no genuine issues of material fact regarding exposure and causation. (Filing No. 37). For the reasons discussed below, the motion to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Chiodo and UPRR’s…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.