Legal Opinion
NASD Dispute Resolution, Inc. v. Judicial Council of California
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 12, 2002No. C-02-3486-SCPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS. CONTI, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In September 2001, the California legislature enacted SB 475, a bill imposing new regulations upon arbitration. The new law directed the California Judicial Council to draft ethical standards for arbitrators and provided that failure to ¡ abide by those standards could be grounds for vacating an arbitration award. By its terms, SB 475 is applicable to all arbitrations in California. NASD Dispute Resolution, Inc. and the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) have sued the Judicial Council, however,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jevne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Mayo v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2003
- Alan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Nasd Dispute Resolution, Inc. v. Judicial Council of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- McNeil v. Van HoutenDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.