Nasd Dispute Resolution, Inc. v. Judicial Council of the State of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLIFTON, Circuit Judge.
The parties agree that this appeal is moot. The underlying dispute has been resolved in other litigation. The parties disagree, however, on what should happen now. Appellants NASD Dispute Resolution, Inc. (“NASD”), and New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE”), the plaintiffs, say we should vacate the district court’s judgment dismissing their lawsuit. The defendant, the Judicial Council of the State of California (“the Council”), asks us to dismiss this appeal without vacating the district court’s judgment. We agree with appellants and vacate the district court judgment.
I.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Patricia Hart v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Karcher v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nasd Dispute Resolution, Inc. v. Judicial Council Of The State Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007