Legal Opinion
Mayo v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 22, 2003No. C-01-20336JF (PVT)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO VACATE ORDER COMPELLING ARBITRATION AND STAYING PROCEEDINGS
FOGEL, District Judge.
On February 4, 2002, the Court granted the motion of Defendant Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. (“Morgan Stanley”) to compel arbitration and to stay proceedings. After Plaintiff commenced arbitration proceedings before the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (“NYSE”), the Judicial Council of California promulgated new ethics standards for arbitrators in California. Plaintiff moves to vacate the Court’s February 4, 2002 Order on the ground that the NYSE’s refusal to appoint an…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, a Massachusetts Corporation v. Michael Scott Grunwald, a California ResidentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Jevne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Alan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Douglas McDaniel v. Wells Fargo Investments, LlcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.