Legal Opinion

Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee v. Jansen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 12, 1991No. CB14-90-924-CVPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRAUGHN, Justice.

The Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee of the State Bar [hereinafter UPLC] appeals from a summary judgment finding, in part, that appellee was not engaged in the unlawful practice of law. In three points of error, UPLC argues that the trial court incorrectly held that appellee, a public insurance adjuster, could continue to present first-party claims to insurance companies on the behalf of insureds. We affirm.

Arthur Jansen, and his firm, Jansen & Company [hereinafter appellee], are public insurance adjusters who represent clients on a contingent fee basis. They…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Brown v. Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  3. Davies v. Unauthorized Practice Committee of the State Bar of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Gibson v. Drew Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Brophy v. BrophyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lidawi v. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  2. Guthery v. Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  3. City of Galveston v. Giles, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  4. Crain v. Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee of the Supreme Court of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. English v. BGP International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API