State v. Dooley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Defendant’s Exceptions II, III, IV, V, and VI relate to the admission into evidence of the .22 caliber pistol found in defendant’s home and the statements allegedly made by him at the Police Station. First, defendant contends the gun was the product of an illegal search and seizure. We do not agree. *88In State v. Vestal, 278 N.C. 561, 180 S.E. 2d 755 (1971), we find the following:
“The owner of the premises may consent to a search thereof and thus waive the necessity of a valid search warrant so as to render the evidence obtained in the search competent, (citations omitted) To…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. CraddockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. AaronCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976