Legal Opinion

United States v. Eggen

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided July 30, 1999No. 98-0502/APublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge CRAWFORD

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted by officer and enlisted members of forcible sodomy, in violation of Article 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 925. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, 9 years’ confinement, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The convening authority approved only so much of the sentence as provided for a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 1 year, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  2. United States v. RayaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  3. United States v. RaymondUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  4. United States v. CacyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  5. United States v. SchnitzerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. MullinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  2. United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
  3. United States v. JonesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  4. United States v. ChaneyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  5. United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API