Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Weitman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1958No. 34602PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

Plaintiffs and defendants own adjoining properties, both of which abut on the Snake river. A small stream now flows in its natural channel through the plaintiffs’ land to the Snake river. The stream does, not touch defendants’ land at any point. At the time plaintiffs bought their land in 1952, the stream was in its natural bed....Defendants bought their land in 1954. In 1914, a ditch had been dug through defendants’ land, and the total stream had flowed through it for many years. At a point above the plaintiffs’ land, the defendants diverted the total flow of the stream back into the old…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Benton v. JohncoxWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Morse v. McGradyWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Mally v. WeidensteinerWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Stranger CreekWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Teitelbaum v. BordersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Walker v. AlbyWashington Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API