Mally v. Weidensteiner
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Stevens county, Blake, J., entered March 7, 1914, in favor of the defendant, in an action for equitable relief, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The principal object sought by the plaintiffs in this action is to have the defendant enjoined from diverting the waters of Grouse creek to his nonriparian homestead land. They also seek apportionment of the waters of Grouse creek between themselves and the defendant for use upon the riparian land of each. The trial court rendered its decree adjudging the defendant entitled absolutely, as against the plaintiffs, to one and one-half cubic feet of water per second of time of the water of Grouse creek for use upon his non-riparian land, upon the ground that he had acquired such right by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Alta Land & Water Co. v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Webb v. Portland Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1838
- Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Fuller.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Rigney v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. ChaseWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Northern California Power Co. v. WallerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Wallace v. WeitmanWashington Supreme Court · 1958