Legal Opinion
Dinkins v. General Aniline & Film Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 21, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLEAN, District Judge.
This is an action for tortious interference with contract relations. The complaint asks for (1) an injunction restraining defendant from interfering with plaintiff’s right to employment with Geigy Chemical Corporation or any other corporation that may desire to employ him; (2) a declaratory judgment as to plaintiff’s rights under a contract dated November 29, 1961 between plaintiff and defendant; and (3) damages in the amount of $150,000 sustained by reason of defendant’s alleged interference with a contract of employment between plaintiff and Geigy Chemical Corporation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kaplan v. Helenhart Novelty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Lisco v. McNicholsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1962
- Huber Baking Co. v. Stroehmann Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Nadya, Inc. v. Majestic Metal Specialties, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Stanley B. Hendler, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Farrell Publishing Corporation v. Cuneo Eastern Press, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grotrian, Helfferich, Schulz, Th. Steinweg Nachf. v. Steinway & SonsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Independence Tube Corp. v. Copperweld Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Federal Maritime Commission v. Atlantic & Gulf/Panama Canal ZoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Disher v. FulgoniAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Norwalk Core v. Norwalk Redevelopment AgencyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.