Legal Opinion
Norwalk Core v. Norwalk Redevelopment Agency
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 8, 1968No. Civ. No. 12017PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON APPLICATION OF FRANK AND ETHEL WILLIAMS FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
In June of 1963 the City of Norwalk, Connecticut, commenced an urban renewal project. (The planning for this project started in 1958, but the Loan and Capital Grant Contract between the Norwalk Redevelopment Agency (Agency) and the Housing and Home Finance Agency (HHFA, now HUD) was not signed until June 1963). In January and February of 1964 David Katz & Sons, a local developer and apartment management firm, entered into negotiation with the Agency to become Preferred Sponsor of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Norwalk Core v. Norwalk Redevelopment AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Chappell & Co., Inc., T. B. Harms Company, Williamson Music, Inc., Frank Loesser and Frank Music Corp. v. J. Jay FrankelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Blaich v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Norwalk Core v. Norwalk Redevelopment AgencyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cox v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1970
- Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. v. ButzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Schneider, Hill & Spangler, Inc. v. CudmoreDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1971
- Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. v. ButzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974