Legal Opinion

State v. Rulo

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1998No. 22104PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROW, Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether Appellant’s forgery conviction in a judge-tried case must be reversed because the record contains no indication that Appellant waived his right to trial by jury.

Appellant, a prior offender and persistent offender, §§ 558.016.2 1 and 558.016.3, respectively, was charged with two counts of forgery, a class C felony. § 570.090.1(4). Each offense was allegedly committed on March 22, 1997, in Ozark County. 2 The trial. court acquitted Appellant of Count I but found him guilty of Count II and imposed a ten-year prison sentence.

Appellant’s brief…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. State v. BibbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  4. State v. HattonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  5. State v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BaxterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  2. Luster v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. FeldtMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State v. SeibertMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. State v. FreemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API