Legal Opinion
Nimetz v. Cappadona
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 17, 1991No. 90-1025PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Chief Judge:
Appellants Allen Nimetz, M.D., and the Washington Clinic (referred to collectively as “Dr. Nimetz”) appeal from a judgment of medical malpractice in favor of appellees *604Peter and Maureen Cappadona (“Mr. Cap-padona”). The trial judge instructed the jury that it could find Dr. Nimetz liable on any of six different theories of negligence, including a theory to which Dr. Nimetz had objected as being unsupported by the evidence. Conceding that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find negligence on the five other theories, Dr. Nimetz renews his contention on appeal that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Landes Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Royal Bank of Canada, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Orr v. CrowderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- District of Columbia v. WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Toy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- King v. KiddDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Jonathan Woodner Co. v. BreedenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Davis v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Nelson v. McCrearyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Victoria Marie Weston and Marie Beatrice Weston v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.