In re Forfeiture of United States Currency in the Amount of Ninety-One Thousand Three Hundred Fifty-Seven & 12/100 Dollars ($91,357.12)
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Judge.
The appellant, the mortgage holder on seized real property, is an intervenor in a forfeiture proceeding brought by the City of West Palm Beach. The trial court entered a summary judgment for the city and against the mortgagee, holding that the forfeiture was not subject to appellant’s preexisting mortgage because it was not recorded prior to the seizure. We reverse in part and affirm in part.
For the purpose of our review, the facts are taken most favorably to the mortgagee. The appellant loaned the property owner $140,000.00. Of that sum, $128,892 was used to satisfy two prior…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hewitt Hewitt v. Punta Gorda State BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Fed. Land Bk. of Columbia v. GodwinSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Eastern Nat. Bk. v. Glendale Fed. Sav.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Luria v. Bank of Coral GablesSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Lámar v. Wheels Unlimited, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Radison Properties, Inc. v. Flamingo Groves, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Argent Mortgage Co. v. Wachovia Bank N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Campbell v. Racetrack Bingo, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Royal Administration, Inc. v. Hannover Life Reassurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003