Legal Opinion

Hewitt Hewitt v. Punta Gorda State Bank

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 13, 1933PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The bill in this case is hardly sufficient as' a creditor’s bill in that it nowhere alleges that the judgment debtor had only an equitable title to the property. George E. Sebring Co. v. O’Rourke 101 Fla. 885, 134 So. 556; Cowdery v. Herring 143 So. 433. Nor does the bill allege that the fraudulent conveyances are obstacles to the full enforcement of the judgment, not is there any prayer for the vacation or cancellation of such fraudulent conveyances, nor to remove them as clouds on the title to the property. Balsey v. Union Cypress Co. 110 So. 263, 92 Fla. 706; Punta Gorda State Bank v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. George E. Sebring Co. v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Cowdery v. HerringSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Balsley v. Union Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1926
  4. Punta Gorda State Bank v. WilderSupreme Court of Florida · 1927

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. 1ST AMERICAN TITLE INS. v. 1st Title Serv. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Estate of KemmerrerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Ulery v. Asphalt Paving, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  4. Furlong v. LeybourneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  5. Riesen v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1943

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API