Legal Opinion

Royal Administration, Inc. v. Hannover Life Reassurance Co. of America

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 9, 2003No. Nos. 3D02-2381, 3D02-2388PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Royal (Royal Administration Inc. and The Royal Company for Life and Health Insurance, Inc.) was the administrator of an international health insurance program provided by Sterling Investors Life Insurance Company to South American insureds. Sterling’s obligations were, in turn, reinsured with five reinsurers, including the two present appellees, Hann-over Life Reassurance Company of America and ReliaStar Life Insurance Company. Acting both as administrator and agent of Sterling and pursuant to its agreements with Sterling, Royal itself paid almost $1,000,000 in claims…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dade Cty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBASupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Federal Insurance v. Arthur Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. DeCespedes v. Prudence Mut. Cas. Co. of Chicago, Ill.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Hewitt Hewitt v. Punta Gorda State BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. Fed. Land Bk. of Columbia v. GodwinSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garal Corp. v. PoceiroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API