Legal Opinion
FANOR v. UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL- UMDNJ
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 26, 2025No. 2:16-cv-00320Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY EVANS FANOR, Civil Action No.: 16-320 Plaintiff, v. OPINION AND ORDER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants. CECCHI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on defendant University Hospital’s (“Defendant”) motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 159). Pro se plaintiff Evans Fanor (“Plaintiff”) opposed the motion (ECF No. 167) and Defendant replied (ECF No. 170). The Court decides this matter without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b). For the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Richard Conoshenti v. Public Service Electric & Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.