Legal Opinion

H. W. Broaddus Co. v. Binkley

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1936No. 6434PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge TAYLOR

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

Plaintiff in error, H. W. Broaddus and Co., Inc., sued defendants in error, J. B. Binkley and R. B. Homan to recover a real estate broker’s commission. From a judgment based upon an unfavorable jury verdict on special issues, plaintiff in error appealed. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment. 54 S. W. (2d) 586.

Brinkley owned an apartment house. Homan owned business property occupied by four tenants, three of whom held under written leases, respectively. Plaintiff in error acting through its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gainesville National Bank v. Bamberger, Bloom & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Putman v. BromwellTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. FinneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Hester v. ShusterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Butler v. ColeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Jung Fu Chien v. ChenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. LUTHERNA BROTH. v. Kidder Peabody & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Adickes v. AndreoliCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Associated Employers Lloyds v. AikenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API