Legal Opinion

Mag-Dolphus, Inc. v. Ohio Casualty Insurance

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided September 12, 2012No. Civil Action No. 4:11-CV-1525PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MELINDA HARMON, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Ohio Casualty Insurance Company’s1 (“Ohio”) motion for summary judgment. Doc. 17. Defendant moves for summary judgment of Plaintiffs’, Mag-Dolphus, Inc.’s, and its owners, Gerald and Jan Maggard’s, claims on the grounds that Plaintiffs’ invocation of the appraisal provision in the insurance contract (“the Policy”) and Defendant’s prompt compliance with the appraisal provision preclude Plaintiffs’ claims as a matter of law. Doc. 17 at 2.

After considering Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, the facts of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Admiral Insurance v. Petron Energy, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
  2. Barbara Technologies Corporation v. State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Barbara Technologies Corporation v. State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Garza v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
  5. Richard Kim v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API