Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Freedman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1885PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Chambers, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Defendant is sued as endorser of a promissory note for $3750 dated April 7, 1883, made by Sampson & Freedman and payable to their own order, endorsed by them without recourse as first endorsers, at four months. The note bears no place of dating, and was made payable at a bank in Detroit. The makers, at its date, were tobacco dealers in Chicago, and defendant is a widow, the aunt of Freedman, one of the makers, and lives in Detroit. Plaintiff, who is doing business in New York Individually but under a firm name, claims to have received the paper a few weeks after its date from the Chicago…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goonen v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Abbott v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Emery v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Parnell v. PungsMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. People v. HansenMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API