Legal Opinion

Fritz v. Otis Elevator Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1988No. 13447PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillin, J.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s decision granting defendant’s summary judgment motion to dismiss the products liability counts of her cause of action because the suit was brought outside the ten-year statute of limitations governing improvements to real property. Plaintiff also appeals the trial court’s failure to give her proposed jury instructions on the subject of comparative negligence. We affirm.

Plaintiff Karen Fritz sustained injuries when she fell while at work. She sued defendant Otis Elevator Company (“Otis”), alleging that an elevator installed and serviced by Otis did not stop…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Daniel C. Adair v. The Koppers Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  2. Elizabeth Gamble Deaconess Home Ass'n v. Turner Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Jones v. Ohio Building Co.Lucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1982
  4. Hartford Fire Insurance v. Lawrence, Dykes, Goodenberger, Bower & ClancyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cyrus v. HenesOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Atelier District v. Parking Co. of America, 07ap-87 (12-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Joseph Cherilus v. Federal ExpressNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
  4. Miller v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
  5. Sette v. Benham, Blair & AffiliatesOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API