Legal Opinion

Sette v. Benham, Blair & Affiliates

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1991No. 90AP-1148PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCormac, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Edward Y. Sette, appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting the motion of defendantappellee, Benham, Blair & Affiliates, for summary judgment on the basis that appellant’s action was barred by the ten-year statute of repose governing improvements to real property.

On January 5, 1976, appellee entered into a contract with appellant’s employer, Metal Container Corporation, to provide architectural and engineering services for the construction of a two-piece can plant to be located in Columbus. Appellee completed its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Sedar v. Knowlton Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Gregory v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Daniel C. Adair v. The Koppers Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  5. Adams v. SherkOhio Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cyrus v. HenesOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Fueston v. Burns & McDonnell Engineering Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Stewart v. Haughton Elevator Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Stewart v. Haughton Elevator Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. The Cincinnati Insurance Company a/s/a Green Recovery Technologies, LLC v. The Commonwealth GroupSuperior Court of Delaware · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API