Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Eden

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1992No. D-2025PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

2Per curiam

This is an original mandamus proceeding. Relator’s notices to depose plaintiffs in the underlying litigation stated that a certain Joe Beard might be in attendance. Plaintiffs’ counsel moved for protection, requesting under Rule 614, Tex.R.Civ.Evid„ that Beard be prohibited from attending the depositions. On November 1, 1991, the trial court granted the motion and ordered:

that because plaintiffs have invoked Rule 614 of the Texas Rules of Evidence as to Joe Beard, the said Joe Beard is prohibited from attending the plaintiffs’ depositions, and is hereby…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Masinga v. WhittingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1990

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burrhus v. M&S SUPPLY, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  2. Grigsby v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re State Farm Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  4. in Re Rowland J. Martin, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2015
  5. in Re the State of Texas Ex Rel Jana Duty, District Attorney, Williamson County v. Honorable Rick J. Kennon, Judge 368th District Court, Real Party in Interest Crispin James HarmelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API