Legal Opinion
In Re State Farm Lloyds
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided May 7, 2008No. 05-08-00426-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice FITZGERALD.
In this petition for writ of mandamus, relator asserts the trial court abused its discretion by prohibiting the parties’ counsel from interviewing the jurors discharged after a mistrial and that it has no adequate remedy at law. We agree that the trial court abused its discretion in prohibiting the parties’ counsel from inter viewing the discharged jurors and that relator has no adequate remedy at law. Accordingly, we conditionally grant the petition for writ of mandamus.
Background
Real parties in interest, James Thomas Siebert and Linda Elaine Siebert, sued…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Davenport v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Commission for Lawyer Discipline v. BentonTexas Supreme Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anthony Leeartis Hall v. Obinna Chinemerem Njoku, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
- in the Interest of K.V.C., Q.V.C., and V.C., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- in the Interest of K.V.C., Q.V.C., and V.C., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011