Legal Opinion

Hall v. Hall

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 24, 1908PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Contract for money had and received. Writ in the Second District Court of Bristol dated August 4,1905. On appeal to the Superior Court, a motion was therein filed and allowed by Bell, J., increasing the ad damnum of the writ from $1,000 to $2,000, and the defendant appealed. Other facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This action was brought in the Second District Court of Bristol, the jurisdiction of which is limited to $1,000. The ad damnum of the writ originally was $500 and the declaration, which was for money had and received, alleged that the defendant owed the plaintiff $400. Subsequently the plaintiff was allowed in that court to amend her writ by making the ad damnum *195$1,000 instead of $500 and to amend her declaration by substituting $1,000 for $100. Judgment was rendered in the District Court in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $379.60 and costs of suit, and the defendant appealed therefrom.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway v. OgilvyNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Fisk v. CushmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
  3. Jackson v. CovertNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Dressler v. DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Hare v. MarshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Crocker v. Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Donnelly v. MontagueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Thayer v. ShoreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Stacy v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  5. Poorvu v. WeisbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API