Legal Opinion

Thayer v. Shorey

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 25, 1934PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action of tort under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 242, § 1. The plaintiffs claim the possession of certain premises and also damages alleged to have been caused by the failure of the defendant to pay taxes assessed thereon. The parties waived jury trial. The trial judge *78ruled that the plaintiffs were entitled to judgment and reported the case.

The facts are not in dispute. The premises in question were formerly the property of the defendant. In 1889 she conveyed them to one “Whittemore, his heirs and assigns” by deed containing these words: “The grantor reserves to herself the right to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pizer v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  2. Merrimac Chemical Co. v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Bothwell v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Delano v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. Plympton v. Boston DispensaryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. The Travelers Insurance Company v. 633 Third AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Chandler v. DunlopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Chapman Drug Company v. ChapmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Hayworth v. BromwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  5. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ETC. v. SeberCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API