Verde Water & Power Co. v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior. Court of the County of Maricopa. F. H. Lyman, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
This is an action to quiet title to the Horseshoe reservoir site. It is more convenient to *307designate the parties here as plaintiff and defendants, as they were in the court below.
The defendant, Salt River Valley Water Users’ Association, separately demurred to the plaintiff’s complaint, filed in the action, on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The defendants, Paradise Verde Water Users’ Association and Paradise Verde Irrigation District, jointly demurred to the complaint on the same grounds. These demurrers were sustained, and the plaintiff,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Light v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Marquez v. FrisbieSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stewart v. Phoenix National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Steinberger v. McVeyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Corliss v. Davidson & Case Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Morn v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Schneider v. DeckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.