Legal Opinion

Winfrey v. Marks

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1968No. 6064PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunsicker, J.

An appeal on questions of law and fact has been lodged in this court from a decree granting a permanent injunction from “proceeding with the construction of the building and parking lot to be used for retail business purposes or for any other purpose in violation of the restrictive covenant contained on the allotment plot on said Lot No. 2 of said allotment.”

Counsel for the plaintiffs (appellees here) claims that no journal entry of judgment has been entered herein. An examination of the transcript of docket and journal entries compels this court to conclude that, although the series of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hurd v. AlbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Dixon v. Van Sweringen Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Carroll v. American Federation Of MusiciansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. Romig v. ModestOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Ockenga v. AlkenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. LuMac Development Corp. v. Buck Point Ltd. PartnershipOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. McBride v. BehrmanHighland County Court of Common Pleas · 1971
  3. Nutis v. Schottenstein TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Glassburn v. FairOhio Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Stephan v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API