Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Verticelli

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 29, 1998No. 90 E.D. Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice.

This case presents the court with a question regarding the parameters of the closely related crime exception to the corpus delicti rule. Upon careful consideration this court finds that application of the closely related crime exception must be determined on a case-by-case basis. For the reasons as more fully set forth herein, the decision of the Superior Court is affirmed in part and reversed in part.

The essential facts underlying this matter are as follows. In the late afternoon hours of March 26, 1994, Officer Burkhardt of the New Britain Township Police…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Commonwealth v. WareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. TurzaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Commonwealth v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DupreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. PalmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. BardoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Miller, Christopher AdrianCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. McMullenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API