Legal Opinion

Maddux v. Mora

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 2, 1929No. Docket No. 5374PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The respondent began the above-entitled suit in Perris township, Riverside County, to recover $160.50 which, by amendments to the complaint was later increased to $237.50, together with $100 attorney’s fees, interest and costs, for breach of a contract. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and an appeal was taken to the Superior Court of Riverside County, wherein judgment was again rendered in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial de novo. From the latter judgment the defendant Mora appealed to this court.

The facts necessary to a consideration of the points presented are as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Waer v. WaerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. People v. RushingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Tibbet v. SueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Big Boy Drilling Corp. v. RankinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Spadoni v. MaggentiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Ogier v. Pacific Oil & Gas Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API