Legal Opinion

Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Board

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 28, 2007No. 05-P-211PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

The petitioner appeals from a decision of a Superior Court judge affirming the Sex Offender Registry Board’s (board’s) classification of him as a level three sex offender. The petitioner’s argument is limited solely to the following determination by the judge:

“Upon careful reading, however, it does not appear that the hearing officer found, or assumed, that the 1991 of*310fense was a forcible rape. The conclusion that Doe ‘sexually assaulted a stranger child victim, raping her multiple times over a two-hour period,’ is a technically correct (if vivid) description of a conviction on two counts of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Merisme v. Board of Appeals on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies & BondsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  2. Embers of Salisbury, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 1211 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  4. Covell v. Department of Social ServicesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. WilcoxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  3. Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  4. Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  5. Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 356011 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API