Legal Opinion
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Board
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided September 28, 2007No. 05-P-211PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
The petitioner appeals from a decision of a Superior Court judge affirming the Sex Offender Registry Board’s (board’s) classification of him as a level three sex offender. The petitioner’s argument is limited solely to the following determination by the judge:
“Upon careful reading, however, it does not appear that the hearing officer found, or assumed, that the 1991 of*310fense was a forcible rape. The conclusion that Doe ‘sexually assaulted a stranger child victim, raping her multiple times over a two-hour period,’ is a technically correct (if vivid) description of a conviction on two counts of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Merisme v. Board of Appeals on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies & BondsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Embers of Salisbury, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 1211 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Covell v. Department of Social ServicesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. WilcoxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 356011 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.