Legal Opinion

Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 356011 v. Sex Offender Registry Board

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 18, 2015No. AC 13-P-1842PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaldonado, J.

Following Doe’s 2011 conviction for indecent assault and battery on a person fourteen years of age or older, 1 the Sex Offender Registry Board (SORB) notified Doe that he would be required to register as a level three sex offender. Doe obtained de novo administrative review pursuant to G. L. c. 6, § 178L. Neither party called any witnesses, and the de novo hearing proceeded on the basis of documentary evidence, which included, among other things, classification records containing a summary of Doe’s disciplinary reports and a police report that described sexual assault allegations of which Doe…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HolmgrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  4. Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  5. Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. JOHN DOE, SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY BOARD NO. 22188 v. SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY BOARD.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
  2. Doe, SORB No. 6969 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2021
  3. John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  4. John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  5. Moe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API