Legal Opinion

State v. Cook

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 2004No. COA03-396PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

James Allen Cook (“defendant”) appeals his convictions of felony possession of a controlled substance, two counts of assault with a deadly weapon on a governmental official, and habitual felon. For the reasons stated herein, we hold that defendant received a trial free of prejudicial error.

The State’s evidence presented at trial tends to show the following: On 21 July 2002, Greensboro police officers Russell Linstad (“Officer Linstad”) and Clint Queen (“Officer Queen”) stopped defendant for minor traffic offenses. When Officer Linstad approached the car and asked…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. PeacockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HoeldtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. State v. HoeldtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Gilbert v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API