Legal Opinion

State v. Hoeldt

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 12, 2007No. 34894-2-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

160 P.3d 55 (2007)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Robbie Philip HOELDT, Appellant.

No. 34894-2-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

June 12, 2007.

John A. Hays, Attorney at Law, Longview, WA, for Appellant.

Michael C. Kinnie, Attorney at Law, Vancouver, WA, for Respondent.

PART PUBLISHED OPINION

ARMSTRONG, P.J.

¶ 1 Robbie Hoeldt appeals his conviction for second degree assault with a deadly weapon based on his pit bull's attack on a police officer. He argues that the State failed to prove that his pit bull was a "deadly weapon." Hoeldt also argues that his counsel was ineffective for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. PartinWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. McCormackWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. TealWashington Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WernerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. WernerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Gilbert v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Finch v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Finch v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API