Legal Opinion

Andrus v. Eunice Band Mill Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 25, 1936No. 33469PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Justice.

Plaintiffs filed suit against the Eunice Band Mill Company, Inc., successors to the Roy O. Martin Lumber Company, to recover the sum of $29,595.58, alleged to be the amount due them under a contract of sale of timber.

Defendant filed exceptions of no right or cause of action which were sustained by the trial judge and the plaintiffs’ suit was dismissed. The plaintiffs have appealed.

This suit is based on a contract dated November 5, 1926, under the terms of which plaintiffs sold all of the merchantable timber of certain kinds and dimensions suitable for sawmill purposes,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Louis Werner Sawmill Co. v. O'SheeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  2. Smith v. Huie-Hodge Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  3. Lee Lumber Co. v. HotardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  4. Walker v. FortSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
  5. Shepherd v. Davis Bros. LumberSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andrus v. Eunice Band Mill Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  2. William M. Gillespie, Sr. v. W. A. Ranson Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  3. Gillespie v. W. A. Ransom Lumber Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1955
  4. Lillis v. OwensLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. LeBlanc v. DavisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API