Legal Opinion

Andrus v. Eunice Band Mill Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 30, 1938No. 34617PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ODOM, Justice.

The issues involved in this litigation are correctly stated in the opinion written by the trial judge. He has reviewed and analyzed the testimony. We have carefully checked the record to see whether he overlooked any issue raised by the pleadings or any material testimony. We find that he did not. He clearly states his conclusions and the reasons upon which they are based. His conclusions are so completely in accord with ours that we adopt his opinion and make it our own.

Opinion of the Trial Judge.

“Morgan D. Andrus and others sued the Eunice Band Mill Company, Inc., successor,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Succession of GilmoreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  2. Globe Lumber Co. v. LockettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. Fred G. Jones & Co. v. SanfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  4. Andrus v. Eunice Band Mill Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  5. Burrus Mill & Elevator Co. v. Eunice Grain Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gallioto v. TrapaniSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
  2. Hanover Insurance Co. v. Caruso-Simoneaux Agency, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API