Legal Opinion
Lee Lumber Co. v. Hotard
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 4, 1909No. 17,109PublishedCited by 14 opinions
Appeal from Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Rapides; Wilbur Fisk Black-man, Judge. Action by the Lee Lumber Company, Limited, against Albert E. Hotard and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtProvosty, J.
By a contract dated October 14, 1906, and recorded October 22, 1906, J. N. Thornhill sold to plaintiff a certain tract of land, including the timber thereon; and by another contract dated September 24, 1906, and recorded on the same day, he sold to plaintiff all the timber upon another tract. He had previously entered into the following agreement with reference to the same timber:
“Buckeye, P. O., La., August 16th, 1905.
“State of Louisiana, Parish of Rapides.
“Know all men by these presents and this instrument that I, J. Newton Thornhill, of the first part, a resident of Buckeye, P. O.,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Louis Werner Sawmill Co. v. O'SheeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Union Sawmill Co. v. Lake Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- W. B. Thompson & Co. v. Union Sawmill Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smith v. Huie-Hodge Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Simmons v. Tremont Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- General Finance Corp. of New Orleans v. HarrellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Brown v. City of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
- Andrus v. Eunice Band Mill Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.