Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Fithian
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 26, 1977No. Civ. 17583PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
—When the marriage of James (hereafter husband) and Camille (hereafter wife) Fithian was dissolved in 1972, it was determined that 71 percent of husband’s military retirement pay was community property. Husband was ordered to pay half, of this amount (35.5 percent) to wife each month as he received payments from the federal government. After experiencing considerable difficulty in enforcing this order, wife sought and obtained an order requiring husband to deposit in court 35.5 percent of his retirement payments each month. Husband appeals from this order. We affirm.
Husband…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Green Trees Enterprises, Inc. v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Phillipson v. Board of Administration, Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re: Wallace Eugene Francis, Tracy Danielle FrancisUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Stone v. StoneDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
- People v. CastilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Verner v. VernerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.