Legal Opinion

Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. Craycraft

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1892No. 583PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNew, J.

This is an action for damages. JJhe appellee recovered judgment in the Clark Circuit Court against the appellant.

The complaint is in one paragraph, and, omitting the heading and signature, reads as follows:

“ Plaintiff complains of the defendant, and says that defendant is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of -, and the owner of a railroad running into and through Clark county, State of Indiana, and says that the defendant on the 31st day of May, 1889, without any fault or negligence on plaintiff’s part, carelessly, negligently and wrongfully ran its train over and upon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton R. R. v. ChesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. NashIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. FennIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fauvre Coal Co. v. KushnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Citizens' Street Railroad Co. of Indianapolis v. StoddardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Citizens' Street Railway Co. v. LoweIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Citizens' Street Railway Co. v. AbrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. German InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API