The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co v. Stuart
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hancock Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
This was a suit by the appellee against the appellant, in a complaint of two paragraphs, to recover damages for injuries sustained by a certain bay horse, *501owned by the appellee, on the appellant’s railroad. To each of the paragraphs of said complaint, the appellant’s demurrer for the want of sufficient facts was overruled by the court, and its exceptions were duly saved to these decisions. The appellant then answered by a general /denial of the complaint.
The issues joined were tried by a jury, and a verdict was returned for the appellee, assessing his damages in the sum of one hundred and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tonawanda Rail-Road v. MungerNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Jackson v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853
- Munger v. . Tonawanda Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Indianapolis, Cincinnati, & Lafayette Railroad v. HarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. NashIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Bostwick v. Minneapolis & Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Moses v. Southern Pacific RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1890
- Atkinson v. MottIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Vandalia Railway Co. v. DulingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.