Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman
It is first contended in behalf of the city of Chicago that the special assessment vouchers in controversy are payable solely out of their respective special assessment funds, and that the city cannot legally pay them out of its general funds, inasmuch as section 90 of the Local Improvement Act (R. S. chap. 24) provides that persons accepting the vouchers “shall have no claim or lien upon the city, town or village in any event for the payment of such vouchers or bonds or the interest thereon, except from the collection of the assessments, against which such vouchers or bonds are issued.” The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Potter v. City of New WhatcomWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- City of Alton v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Vider v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- City of Danville v. Danville Water Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Warner v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Municipal Securities Corp. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
- Dennis v. City of McMinnvilleOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Murrie v. HarperAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
- Prange v. City of MarionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943