Legal Opinion

United States v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 26, 1937No. 8380PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Suing for penalties under the Cruelty to Animals Act,1 *****the United States moved for judgment on the pleadings. This motion overruled and a jury waived, the cause was submitted upon an agreed statement of facts.

The District Judge concluding that the defendant had not, within the meaning of the act, knowingly and willfully failed to comply with its provisions, made findings and conclusions and gave judgment accordingly. This appeal tests whether, upon the facts pleaded, stipulated, and found,2 judgment for the United States was demanded. In summary, this is the case…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Hargrove v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  3. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. St. Joseph Stockyards Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  5. Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arrow Distilleries, Inc. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API