Legal Opinion
Pens. Plan Guide P 23889f
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 28, 1993No. 36-3PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
9 F.3d 1553
Pens. Plan Guide P 23889F
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
James W. POTTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
EATON CORPORATION, et al.; Eaton Corporation, Pension Plan
for Salaried Employees, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-15848.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1993.
Decided Oct. 28, 1993.
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and BRUNETTI, Circuit…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jack Allen v. City of Beverly HillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
3Cited by34 opinions
- Kifafi v. Hilton Hotels Retirement PlanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Bill Norman Thompson v. C.E. Floyd, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Chen v. U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Chiet Saephanh v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Daniel N. Rios v. Mark Henry, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.